Crustacean Morphological Adaptations in Controlled Aquaculture Environments and Feeding Systems

Authors

  • Jason McAllister University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/va9pch67

Keywords:

crustacean morphology, aquaculture adaptation, feeding systems, gill structure, immune response, physiological plasticity

Abstract

Crustacean aquaculture has experienced unprecedented growth in recent decades, necessitating comprehensive understanding of morphological adaptations in controlled environments. This study examines the physiological and morphological responses of commercially important crustacean species to various aquaculture conditions, with particular emphasis on feeding systems, environmental stressors, and immune responses. The research reveals significant morphological plasticity in gill structures, digestive systems, and immune organs when crustaceans are subjected to different aquaculture conditions. Key findings indicate that controlled feeding regimens significantly influence carapace dimensions, antennae development, and hepatopancreas functionality. Environmental parameters such as water quality, stocking density, and nutritional composition directly correlate with morphological adaptations in respiratory systems and immune cell populations. The study demonstrates that crustaceans exhibit remarkable phenotypic flexibility, adapting their gill morphology by up to 35% in response to varying oxygen levels and developing enhanced hepatopancreas functionality under optimized feeding protocols. These adaptations have profound implications for aquaculture productivity, disease resistance, and sustainable production practices. Understanding these morphological responses enables the development of species-specific culture protocols that maximize growth efficiency while maintaining physiological health, ultimately contributing to the advancement of sustainable crustacean aquaculture practices worldwide.

References

1. Z. Xu, H. Zhang, M. Guo, D. Fang, J. Mei, and J. Xie, "Analysis of Acute Nitrite Exposure on Physiological Stress Response, Oxidative Stress, Gill Tissue Morphology and Immune Response of Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea)," Animals, vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 1791–1791, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ani12141791.

2. J. Yuan, X. Zhang, F. Li, and J. Xiang, "Genome Sequencing and Assembly Strategies and a Comparative Analysis of the Ge-nomic Characteristics in Penaeid Shrimp Species," Front. Genet., vol. 12, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.658619.

3. Q. Wang, J. X. Yang, G. Q. Zhou, Y. A. Zhu, and H. Shan, "Length–weight and chelae length–width relationships of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii under culture conditions," J. Freshwater Ecol., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 287–294, 2011, doi: 10.1080/02705060.2011.564380.

4. R. Tong, L. Pan, X. Zhang, and Y. Li, "Neuroendocrine‐immune regulation mechanism in crustaceans: A review," Rev. Aquac., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 378–398, 2021, doi: 10.1111/raq.12603.

5. A. Ciji and M. S. Akhtar, "Stress management in aquaculture: a review of dietary interventions," Rev. Aquac., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2190–2247, 2021, doi: 10.1111/raq.12565.

6. P. Yang, Y. Chen, Z. Huang, H. Xia, L. Cheng, and H. Wuet al., "Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of shrimp immune cells identifies macrophage-like phagocytes," eLife, vol. 11, 2022, doi: 10.7554/elife.80127.

7. M. Miao, S. Li, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, and F. Li, "Comparative transcriptome analysis of hepatopancreas reveals the potential mechanism of shrimp resistant to Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection," Fish Shellfish Immunol., vol. 144, p. 109282, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2023.109282.

8. S. Liu, S.-C. Zheng, Y.-L. Li, J. Li, and H.-P. Liu, "Hemocyte-Mediated Phagocytosis in Crustaceans," Front. Immunol., vol. 11, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00268.

9. Q. Wang, Z. Z. Wang, H. Shan, C. Z. Ding, D. Wu, and M. Jianget al., "The construction of migration crab passageways and the carapace length-weight relationships of migratory Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853 (Decapoda: Brachyura: Varunidae) in the Yangtze River, China," J. Crustacean Biol., vol. 45, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1093/jcbiol/ruaf012.

10. Y. Su, F. Yang, and F. Li, "Comparison analysis of circulating hemocytes in decapod crustaceans," Fish Shellfish Immunol., vol. 154, p. 109947, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2024.109947.

11. X. Zhang, J. Yuan, Y. Sun, S. Li, Y. Gao, and Y. Yuet al., "Penaeid shrimp genome provides insights into benthic adaptation and frequent molting," Nat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08197-4.

12. T. W. Flegel, "A future vision for disease control in shrimp aquaculture," J. World Aquac. Soc., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 249–266, 2019, doi: 10.1111/jwas.12589.

13. S. Maulu, O. J. Hasimuna, L. H. Haambiya, C. Monde, C. G. Musuka, and T. H. Makorwaet al., "Climate Change Effects on Aquaculture Production: Sustainability Implications, Mitigation, and Adaptations," Front. Sustain. Food Syst., vol. 5, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.609097.

14. N. K. Yadav, A. B. Patel, S. K. Singh, N. K. Mehta, V. Anand, and J. Lal et al., "Climate change effects on aquaculture production and its sustainable management through climate-resilient adaptation strategies: A review," Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33397-5.

15. H. Manan and M. Ikhwanuddin, "Triploid induction in penaeid shrimps aquaculture: a review," Rev. Aquac., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 619–631, 2020, doi: 10.1111/raq.12489.

16. D. D. Kuhn, S. A. Smith, G. D. Boardman, M. W. Angier, L. Marsh, and G. J. Flick, "Chronic toxicity of nitrate to Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei: Impacts on survival, growth, antennae length, and pathology," Aquaculture, vol. 309, no. 1–4, pp. 109–114, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.014.

Downloads

Published

19 August 2025

How to Cite

McAllister, J. (2025). Crustacean Morphological Adaptations in Controlled Aquaculture Environments and Feeding Systems. Science, Engineering and Technology Proceedings, 2, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.71222/va9pch67