AI-Based Automated Grading Systems: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15534471Keywords:
AI grading, automated assessment, artificial intelligence, machine learning, education technologyAbstract
Automated grading systems powered by artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly transformed education by enhancing efficiency, reducing grading biases, and providing instant feedback. This paper explores the opportunities, challenges, and future directions of AI-based automated grading systems. Opportunities include increased scalability, cost reduction, and enhanced student learning experiences. However, challenges such as bias in AI models, lack of human touch, ethical concerns, and data security issues remain prevalent. Future directions involve the integration of explainable AI, improved natural language processing (NLP) capabilities, and a focus on enhanced fairness and transparency. This paper concludes by emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to optimize AI-driven grading solutions.
References
1. A. Gobrecht et al., "Beyond human subjectivity and error: a novel AI grading system," arXiv Prepr. arXiv:2405.04323, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04323.
2. C. Xiao et al., "Human-AI collaborative essay scoring: A dual-process framework with LLMs," in Proc. 15th Int. Learn. Anal. Knowl. Conf., Mar. 2025, pp. 293–305, doi: 10.1145/3706468.3706507.
3. S. Sonkar, N. Liu, D. B. Mallick, and R. G. Baraniuk, "Marking: Visual grading with highlighting errors and annotating missing bits," in Proc. Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Educ., Jul. 2024, pp. 309–323. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. ISBN: 9783031643019.
4. A. Dimari et al., "AI-based automated grading systems for open book examination system: implications for assessment in higher education," in Proc. 2024 Int. Conf. Knowl. Eng. Commun. Syst. (ICKECS), Apr. 2024, vol. 1, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/ICKECS61492.2024.10616490.
5. Z. Mo, “AI-Assisted Strategies for Improving Chinese Proficiency in Non-Native AP Exam Takers”, J. Comput. Signal Syst. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 115–122, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.71222/4tksvc16.
6. I. Saputra, A. Kurniawan, M. Yanita, E. Y. Putri, and M. Mahniza, “The evolution of educational assessment: How artificial intelligence is shaping the trends and future of learning evaluation,” Indones. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 13, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.33022/ijcs.v13i6.4465.
7. Q. Xia, X. Weng, F. Ouyang, T. J. Lin, and T. K. Chiu, “A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, p. 40, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z.
8. I. Gambo, F. J. Abegunde, O. Gambo, R. O. Ogundokun, A. N. Babatunde, and C. C. Lee, “GRAD-AI: An automated grading tool for code assessment and feedback in programming course,” Educ. Inf. Technol., pp. 1–41, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13218-5.
9. Z. Mo, “Artificial Intelligence in Lifelong Learning: Enhancing Chinese Language Instruction for Non-Native Adult Learn-ers”, GBP Proc. Ser., vol. 2, pp. 141–146, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.71222/vxzcka39.
10. J. Gardner, M. O’Leary, and L. Yuan, “Artificial intelligence in educational assessment: ‘Breakthrough? Or buncombe and ballyhoo?’,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1207–1216, 2021, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12577.
11. C. Figueras, A. Farazouli, T. Cerratto Pargman, C. McGrath, and C. Rossitto, “Promises and breakages of automated grading systems: a qualitative study in computer science education,” Educ. Inq., pp. 1–22, 2025, doi: 10.1080/20004508.2025.2464996.
12. S. Caspari-Sadeghi, “Artificial intelligence in technology-enhanced assessment: A survey of machine learning,” J. Educ. Technol. Syst., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 372–386, 2023, doi: 10.1177/00472395221138791.
13. L. Chen, P. Chen, and Z. Lin, “Artificial intelligence in education: A review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 75264–75278, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.
14. M. Murtaza, Y. Ahmed, J. A. Shamsi, F. Sherwani and M. Usman, "AI-Based Personalized E-Learning Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Solutions," IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 81323-81342, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193938.
15. V. Suresh, R. Agasthiya, J. Ajay, A. A. Gold and D. Chandru, "AI based Automated Essay Grading System using NLP," in 2023 7th Int. Conf. Intell. Comput. Control Syst. (ICICCS), Madurai, India, 2023, pp. 547-552, doi: 10.1109/ICICCS56967.2023.10142822.
16. Z. Mo, “AI-powered Language Learning: Empowering Non-Native Children to Master Chinese”, J. Linguist. Cult. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 24–33, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.70088/ev8tgr31.
17. K. Ercikan and D. F. McCaffrey, “Optimizing implementation of artificial-intelligence-based automated scoring: An evidence centered design approach for designing assessments for AI-based scoring,” J. Educ. Meas., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 272–287, 2022, doi: 10.1111/jedm.12332.
18. Z. Mo, “Artificial Intelligence Empowering Online Teaching of Chinese as a Foreign Language: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Prospects”, Educ. Insights, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 18–29, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.70088/nwwqch86.
19. A. M. Naeem, A. Gad, M. Alhalabi, M. Yaghi, A. Khelifi and M. Ghazal, "AI-Based Mobile Paper Grading: Trends and Challenges," in 2023 10th Int. Conf. Future Internet Things Cloud (FiCloud), Marrakesh, Morocco, 2023, pp. 404-409, doi: 10.1109/FiCloud58648.2023.00065.
20. K. Twabu and M. Nakene-Mginqi, “Developing a design thinking artificial intelligence driven auto-marking/grading system for assessments to reduce the workload of lecturers at a higher learning institution in South Africa,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, 2024.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Junyao Wang, Yasmin Hussain, Xijia Zhang, Chencheng Mao, Zhao Wu (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.